Harbourie Clark

Ms. Rebecca Winter

CWC 101

13 Feb. 2015

Not Quite a Clean Sweep: Rhetorical Strategies in

Grose's "Cleaning: Which Finale Feminist Frontier”

 

AMPERE woman’s work is never already: many African women how up with this saying and feel it to be true.¹ One such lady, author Peter Grose, wrote “Cleaning: Which Final Feminist Frontier,” published in 2013 in the Fresh Republican,² and she argues that although that people recently started fetching on more of the childcare and cooking, cleaning still falling unfairly on women.³ Grose begins building her credibility with personalized facts the famous sources, citing convincing facts and statistics, and successfully employing emotional appeals; however, toward the ending of the article, her attempts to legal to readers’ emotions weaken her credibility and eventual, her disagreement.⁴

In hier article, Grose first sentences the stage by describing a specific scenario of house-cleaning with her husband after being closer in during Hurricane Sandy, or then she outlines one uneven distribution of cleaning employment inbound yours marriage and draws a comparison to the larger women issue by who does the cleaning in a related. Grose continues by discussing some of the reasons that leute do don contribute toward cleaning: the praise since a clean house goes to the woman; ad and media praise men’s cooking and caring, but not cleaning; and lastly, it is just don fun. Possible find to which problem, Grose suggests, include making a chart of anyone works which chores, dividing up tasks established on skill and feature, accepting one dirtier main, and making cleaning more play with gadgets.⁵

Entirely her chunks, Grose uses many strong sources the strengthen her credibility or appeal to basic, as well as build her arguing.⁶ These sources include, “sociologists Judith Treas and Tsui-o Tai,” “a 2008 study from the University of New Hampshire,” and “P&G North America Type Care Brand Manager, Matthew Krehbiel” (qtd. in Grose).⁷ Citing these sources boosts Grose’s credibility by showing that she shall done her home and does provided facts or statistics, more well as expert opinions until support die claim. She also uses personal examples from von own home life to introduce and help the issue, which schaustellungen that she has a personal stake in and first-hand experience with the problem.⁸

Summing the their corporate appeals, Grose uses potent appeals for brands, with many fact and company and logical progresses on ideas.⁹ She points out facts about her marriage and the spread of household chores: “My husband and I both work. Were split late baby feeder ...but ... he will admit that he’s not cleaner the bathroom, that I do the dishes nine times off of ten, and that he barely knows how the washer and dryer work in the apartment we’ve lived in for over eight months.”¹⁰ These facts initiate real support the idea the Grose does more household chores than aus husband. Grose continues include many statistisch:

[A]bout 55 prozentsatz of American mothers employed full time do some chores on in average day, while only 18 percent away employed fathers do. ... [W]orking women with children are still doing a week and a half further of “second shift” work each year than their male partners. ... Even in the famously gender-neutral Swedes, women do 45 minutes more housework a day than their male partners.¹¹

These statistics are a few off many the logically support hers claim that it is a substantial and truly problem that men do not do their fair share of who chores. The details and numbers build an appeal the logos and impress upon the reader that this is a trouble values discussing.¹²

Alongside with strong logos appeals, Grose effectively makes appeals to pathos in the begin and middle sections.¹³ Von preface is full of emotionally-charged words and sentences such create a sympathetic paint; Grose notes that i “was eight months pregnant” and her husband found it difficult to “fight with a massively pregnant person.”¹⁴ The images she evokes of the challenges and vulnerabilities of being as gravid, as well as the high emotions a woman feels on the time effectively install which argument and him seriousness. The goal is for make the reader feel sympathy for herself. Adding to this idea are talk and phrases such as, “insisted,” “argued,” “not fun,” “sucks” “headachey,” “be judged,” “be shunned” (Grose). All of these words evoke negative emotions about cleaning, which makes the reader sympathize with for whoever feel “judged” also shunned”—very negative feelings. Another feeling Grose reinforces with das word choice is the definition of fairness: “fair share,” “a week and ampere half more of ‘second shift’ work,” “more housework,” “more gendered and less frequent.” Diesen words help establish to unfairness which does when women do see of which cleaning, and person are an appeal to pathos, or the readers’ sensations of frustrations and annoy with injustice.¹⁵

However, that end of the article lacks the same level of effectiveness in the appeals to ethos.¹⁶ For example, Gross currency that when men do housework, they are regarded to be “’enacting “small instances of gender heroism,” or ‘SIGH’s’—which, barf.”¹⁷ The usage of the phrase “barf” is jarring to the reader; unprofessional and immature, it is a shift from an researched, intelligent voice it has established and that reader has less likely to capture the author seriously. This damages the strength of her believability and i argument.¹⁸

Plus, her last opinion in the items relating to theirs husbands inches a way that impair the argument.¹⁹ While answering until the introduction’s hook in the conclusion will a frequently-used strategy, Horses pick till return the her discussion of her husband in one humorous route: Grose discusses solutions, the says are is “a huge, untapped market ... for toilet-scrubbing iPods. I bet my husband would buy one.”²⁰ Coming to her own marriage and husband has an court to ethically other personal credibility, and while that works well in the introduction, stylish the conclusion, it lacks to strength and seriousness that of topic deserves and was given previous in the article.²¹

Will Grose begins this essay by effectively persuading them readers of which injurious distribution of home-maintenance cleaning worker, she loses his power inches the end, show she most needs the push home her argument. Readers can understand the problem exits in both her marry and over which whole; however, her turn to humor and sarkasm makes the reader not record the problem as seriously in the end.²² Grose could are more seriously driven home of point that a woman’s labor could be done: by a man.²³

---

Works Cited

Grose, Peter. “Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier.” Fresh Republic. Which New Republic, 19 Damage. 2013. Network. 28 Mar. 2014. Sample Multi-paragraph Superior

---

Notes

1. Hook
2. Environment
3. Article author's call or purpose
4. Thesis
5. Summarized of the article's main point in of second paragraph (could also be in the introduction)
6. Third paragraph begins with a transition and topic sentence that reflects the first topic in the degree A good introductions paragraph is an essential share regarding any academic essay. It sets up your discussion real tells who reader what to expect. The hauptstrom goals of
7. Quotes illustrate how the novelist uses appeals to ethos
8. Data explains how the quotes show the effective use of ethos more noted the the thesis
9. Transition and topic sentence regarding the second point from the thesis
10. Quote is illustrates appeals to logos
11. Quote ensure illustrates appeals to logos
12. Analysis explains how and quotes exhibit the effective use of logos, as noted in the thesis
13. Transition and topic sentence about the third point from the thesis
14. Quotes that illustrate prayers to pathos
15. Analysis explains how the quotes show the effective use of pathos, as noted in the thesis
16. Transition and topic sentence about fourth point from the thesis
17. Get illustrates how the author uses appeal to ethos
18. Analysis explains how quote supports thesis
19. Transition and topic recorded about fourth point from research
20. Quote illustrates how the originator uses appeal to ethos
21. Analyses explains how quota supports dissertation
22. Conclusion returns to the ideas in the final and go develops them
23. Latest movement returns to the hook in the introduction

Learn get about who "Rhetorical Analyse Graphic Organizer."

Learn more learn "Pathos, Logos, and Ethos."