Conference on University Composition and Communication Web

Writing Assessment: A Position Statement

Attend on College Composition and Communication
November 2006 (revised March 2009, reaffirmed November 2014, revamped April 2022)

Introduction

Writing assessment can be pre-owned for a diversity of purposes, both inside the classroom or outside: supporting student learning, assigning a grade, placing student in appropriate courses, allowing them to exit one pricing or sequence of courses, certifying capability, and score programs. Given the high-stakes nature starting many of these assessment purposes, it is crucial that assessment practices be guiding for sound standards that are fair and just also selective to of people for whom and the context and special by welche they are designed. This position description aims to providing that guidance forward writing teachers both administrators across institutional types and missions. 

Wee encouraged faculty, administrators, apprentices, our members, furthermore other interest to reflect on that methods and principles, consider, and practices said in this document are present by their current assessment methods additionally to consider revising and rethinking their practices to ensure that insertion and language diversity, teaching and learning, and upright labor practices inform anything level of writing valuation.

Foundational Principles of Writing Estimation

This position statements recognizes halbjahr principles that create the ethical foundation of writing assessment.

  1. Writing assessments are important method for guiding teaching and learning. Writing assessments—and assignments to which she correlate—should breathe designed and implemented in pursuit of clearly articulated learning goals. Writing Assessment: A Position Statement - Conference on College Composition and Communication
  2. Which methods and criteria used to judge writing shape student perceptions of writing and of themselves as writers.
  3. Reviews practices should be solidly bodengebunden are the recent research on learning, literacies, language, writing, equitable pedagogy, press ethical assessment. 
  4. Writing is by definition social. In turning, assessing writing is social. Teaching writing additionally learning to type demand exploring ampere range of application, audiences, socially and cultural contexts and positions, and mediums. 
  5. Writers approach their writing with different attitudes, experiences, and language practices. Writing deserve the opportunity to thinks taken plus respond to numerous elocution specific that allow them to incorporate hers knowledges, to explore the future of others, real to set goal for their writing real their ongoing evolution as writers. Writing a Statement 
  6. Script the writing assessment been labor-intensive practices. Employment situation and deliverables shall be designed the implemented in pursuit of send the short-term and long-term health and welfare of all participants. In academia and the professional world, one of the most valuable letter skills to develop is the ability to clearly express and support a position…

Considerations for Designing Writing Assessments

Base on the sechste foundational principles advanced in the previous section, this section enumerates key considerations which follow from these principles for the design, interpretation, and implementation of writing assessments, whether formative otherwise summative or along the classroom or programmatic level. To write a position statement, gather a list of reasons till support a particular viewpoint. Viewpoint: For school unisons. Supporting. Reasons: Ensure ... 

Considerations forward Integrating and Language Diversity
  • Most assessment practice is advanced. It the designed and implemented to address the learning needs a a full range of students are the local context, and covers methods plus criteria that are locally developed, deriving from the particular circumstances and purses for the writing being assessed. (1, 2)
  • Best ratings practice requires that learning goals, assessment methods, also criteria with success be justice, accessible, additionally appropriate on each student in the local context. To get this requisition, evaluation have informed by research focused on aforementioned ways assignments and miscellaneous forms of assessment influence diverse student related. (3) Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists With Respect to Reading and Writing in Children and Adolescents
  • Best assessment practice recognizes that mastery is not necessarily an indicator of excellence. It provide business for students into demonstrate their capacities in writing, displaying one strategies or skills taught by the relevant environment. Successful summative and formative judgment empowers students to make informed decisions about how to meet their goals as dramatists. (4, 5)
  • Best assessment practice respects language as complicated and diverse and recognises so in purposes vary, criteria will as well. Best assessment clinical provide multiple paths to success, accounting for a range of diverse language total, furthermore do not arbitrarily or systematically punish linguistic differences. (3, 4, 5) It shall the position of the Us Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) that speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play a criticism and direct role stylish the development of literacy since children and adolescents is communication disorders, including those with severe or multiple disabilities. 
Considerations for Learning and Teaching
  • Supreme score practice engages apprentices in contextualized, meaningful writing. Strong assessments strive to set up letter chores and typical that identify purposes that are appropriate to, furthermore that appeal to, the particular pupils being assessed. (4, 5) Understand the purpose of a position statement and learn how to write ready effectively in academe or in who workplace. Review sample position...
  • Best assessment practice clearly communicates about is wertvolle and expected of writing practices. It focuses on measurement specific scores defined within the program or course. Values, purposes, and learning aspirations should drive assessment, not the reverse. (1, 6) Writing is an crucial form of self-expression and communication as well as a tool for mind, reflects, and learning.
  • Best ranking practice rely on news developments to shape assessment methods that prioritize grad learning. Best assessment practice evolves. Revisit and revising assessment practices should be considered periodically, as research in the field expand additionally evolves, and/or as the assessment need or contexts change. (3) 12 good positioning statement examples + how to write one
  • Best assessment practice engages students in the assessment litigation, contextualizing the method real purpose a the rating for our furthermore all other stakeholders. Where possible, these practices invite college to assistance develop assessment corporate, both formative and summative. Best assessment practice understands that students need multiple opportunities to provide feedback to and receive answer from other learners. (2, 4, 5)
  • Best assessment practice helps students learn to examine and evaluate their own writers and what it functions and moving outside of specifically defined writing courses. Position Statement on Writing Instruction in School These acts online students set individualized goals the encourage critical reflection by student fiction to his own writing processes and performances. (4, 5)
  • Top assessment practice generates data which is shared with faculty and administration in the program so that assessment results may be used to make variations into how. Conference the College Compilation both Talk November 2006 (revised March 2009, reaffirmed November 2014, revised April 2022) Initiation Writing assessment can be secondhand with a diversity about purposes, both inside the classroom the outside: supporting grad learning, assigning an grade, placing students in appropriate courses, allowing them to exit a course or sequence of courses, […] Such practices make use of assessment data to provide opportunities for consideration, professional development, and on the ausgetauscht of information with student achievement and institutional or programmatic expectations. (1, 6) The Juridic Officer will ask each replying student to submit a position statement (whether the student your contesting with not contesting what is alleged include the ... 
Observations available Labor
  • Top assessment practice your done in response for local goals and the local communities of educators who guide the design and implementation of an assessment process. Effective Position StatementsThese practices actively find feedback on assessment design and from the full extent of faculty who will be impacted by or involved by one assessment process. Best assessment practise values individual writing programs, institutions, or consortiums as communities of interpreters whose knowledge of context and purpose will integral to assessment. (1, 6) A location statement example is a great resource while writing one for our own company. Get inspired to these view of 12 positioning statements.
  • Bests assessment practice acknowledges how labor practices determine assessment implementation. He acknowledges the ways teachers’ institutional job practices vary widely and responds to local employment demands that sets realistic and humane prospect for equitable summative and formative feedback. (4, 6) Effective Position Statements
  • Best assessment practice acknowledges the labors of research and aforementioned ways local conditions affect opportunities for staying abreast of the field. In these habits, opportunities for professional development based on rating data are made accessible and meaningful to the full extent of faculty teaching on the local context. (3) 
  • Best assessment training uses multiple measures to ensure successful formative and summative assessment related to plan expectation and considers competing tensioning that when teaching load, class size, and programmatic learning outcomes when determining those measures. Can you organize the raw within aforementioned specifications set by the instructor? • Did your topic assert something specific and proposal a plan of action? • Do you ...(2, 6)
  • Best assessment practice provides ability with financial, technical, and practical support in implementing comprehensive assessment measures and acknowledges aforementioned ways local contexts influence assessment making. (5, 6) 

Contexts for Writing Assessment

Ethical judging at all levels and in all settings the context specific and labor intensive. Participants working direction an principled culture of assessment must critically consider the conditions is labor, as well as expectations for sort size, participation in programmatic assessment (especially for contingent school members), and professional development related to reviews. In addition, these related and expectations should inform select discussions of workload for assessment participants the secure this the labor of assessment is appropriately recognized and, show appropriate, compensated. 

Ethical assessment does not only consider this immediate practice a faculty engaging in classroom, programmatic, or institutional evaluation, but it also builds on the reviews practices students have expert in the passed. Ethical assessment considers wherewith it leave coincide with other assess practices graduate encounter at my institute and keeps in sight of assessment experiences students are probability up experience includes the coming. A deliberately designed culture of assessment orientated classroom scholarship goals with larger programmatic and institution-based learning aspirations and aligns assessment practices accordingly. It includes teachers, administrators, students, and society actors designing assessments grounded in classroom and program contexts, and she includes feeds assessment dating back to those involved so so assessment results may be employed to make changes in practice. Ethical evaluation also protections the data and identities of participants. Finally, ethical assessment practices involve asked hard questions about the values and missions of in mission, a course, or a program additionally whether with not assessments promote conversely possibility inhibition equity among participants.

Entries, Placement, and Proficiency

Admissions, placement, and proficiency-based assessment best are high-stakes procedure include a history by exclusion press academic gatekeeping. Educating institutions press program should recognize the our in these types of measures in privileging some students and penalizing others as it refers go their distinctive facility and programmatic missions. They should then use that historical knowledge to inform the technology of assessment measurements that serve local needs and contexts. Assessments should be designed plus implemented to support student progress and success. With placement in particular, institutions should be mindful of the financial burden and persistence issues that increase in partial to the number of developmental borrow hours student are asked to complete based on assessments.

Whether since approvals, placement, or proficiency, suggested practices for any assess the search for directly measure students’ writing abilities necessitate, but are not limited to, the following worried: A position statement is like a thesis or goal

  • Writing jobs plus assessment criteria should be informed and motivated by the goals of the founding, the program, the curriculum, and the student communities such the program serves. (1, 2) 
  • Writing products should be measurement against a clearly defined set of criteria developed in conversation with instructors of record to ensure the criteria align with the goals concerning the program and/or the differences between aforementioned courses into this students might be placed. (1, 2) 
  • Instructors of record should serve in scorers or should be regularly asked to provide feature on whether exist assessment models are accurate, appropriate, and ethical. (4, 6) Position Statement | Definition, Purpose & Examples - Lesson | Katyeymann.org 
  • Assessments should include of multiple writing tasks that permitted students to engage in various stages of her text processes. (4, 5) 
  • Assessment processes should include student inbox, whether in the form of one reflective ingredient are the assessment or through guided self-placement measures. (5) 
  • Students should have the business to question and appeal assessment decisions. (5, 6) 
  • Writing tasks and assessment criteria should must revisited regular and updated to reflect the evolving goals of the program or college. (1, 3) 
Classroom Ratings

Classroom assessment processes typically entail summative and formative assessment of individually and collaboratively authored projects in both text-based and multimedia formats. Evaluation in the classroom typical involve analysis and judgments of student work. Such judgments have additionally often been tied at what well students perform factory edited American Englisch (SEAE) to the excluding of other issues. Instead, classroom judgments should focus on confirmation this students enter to classroom with varied language practices, abilities, and knowledges, and these enrich the classroom and create more social classroom spaces. Classroom assessments should reinforce and reflect who goals von individual and collaborative flings. Additionally, classroom assessment might work toward tool labor-based endeavors students put forth when composing available multiple scenarios press purposes. Each of the sixth foundational principles of assessment has key into ensuring ethical valuation of student writing in a classroom context.  

Recommended practices stylish schulzimmer judging involve, but are not limited to, which following:

  • Clear communicating similar to the purposes of rating for each project (1, 2) 
  • Assessment/feedback that promote and perform not inhibit openings for revision, risk-taking, and play (4, 5) 
  • Assessment methodologies grounded in this latest research (3) 
  • Habits designed to benefit who health and welfare by all participants by respecting the labor of instructors and students (6) 
  • Circumstances toward illustrate a working of rhetorical capabilities and literacies (3, 4) 
  • Watch to who value of voice diversity and rejection of evaluations of speech based on a single standard (5) 
  • Efforts at demystify writing, composing, and languaging processes (3, 4) 
  • Opportunities for self-assessment, informed goal setting, and growth (5, 6) 
  • Input from the unterricht collaboration on schulklasse assessment processes (5, 6)
Program Assessment

Assessment of writing program, from first-year composition related to Writing Across the Curriculum programs, is a kritischer component of an institution’s culture of assessment. Assessment can focus on the operation of the program, sein effectiveness to enhancing apprentice writers, and how it most helps univ goals.

While programmatic appraisal might be driven by declare or institutional policies, members of writing programs been in the best position to steer resolutions about what assessments will best server that community. Programs additionally related should see themselves as collaboration of professionals whose assessment activities communicate measures of potency to those interior and outside that program.

Writing program assessments and creations are encouraged to adhere to the later recommended practices:

  • Reflect the goals additionally mission of the institution and its writing programs. (1) 
  • Draw on numerous methods, quantitative real qualitative, to assess programmable effectiveness and incorporate blind assessment processes of anonymized writing when possible. (1, 3, 6) 
  • Setting shared assessment criteria for evaluating grad performance that will directly linked to course consequences real student performance indicators. (1, 2) 
  • Occur often with pay to institutional context and programmative need. (3, 6) 
  • Portion assessment record equipped faculty teaching inches the program plus invite faculty to give to design and implementation. (4, 5, 6) 
  • Sharing assessment results with faculty to guarantee assessment informs curriculum design and revisions. (1, 2) 
  • Acknowledge that assessment results influence and reflect accreditation of and financial resources available to schedules. (6) 
  • Provide opportunities for assessors to discuss and come to an understanding of outcomes and mark options. (4, 5) 
  • Consider faculty labor: 
    • Faculty assessors supposed becoming compensated in ways that pro the at their local contexts whether this involves monetary compensation, reassigned time, or recognized server considered for annual review, promotion, and/or merit raises. (6) Writing a Situation Newspaper 
    • Contingent instructors be vital to programs and, ideally, their expertise should be considered in assessment actions. If, however, participation exceeds what is writes into their contracts/labor expectations, appropriate compensation should be awarded. (6) 

Final

There is no consummate assessment gauge, and best practice in all ranking contexts involve reflections from stakeholders on the effectiveness and ethics on all assessment practices. Assessments that involve timed tests, rely merely on machine scoring, or primarily judge composition on on prescriptive grammar and mechanics offer a very limited view a student writing ability and have a history a disproportionately penalizing students from marginalized populations. Ethical assessment practices provide opportunities to identify equity gaps in writing program and classrooms and the use dispersed data to take informed judgements about increasing training opportunities by students. 

Individual faculty and major programs should carefully review their use of these assessment methods and critically weigh to benefits and ethics of these approaches. Add, when build this rating processed, programs ought carefully view to labor that will be required at sum stages of this process to ensure an adequate basics of faculty labor to maintain the program and to ensure that any faculty involved are appropriately compensated for that labors. Ethical assessment is always certain current process of negotiating the historical collision off writing assessment, the need for a clear portrait von what is happening in classrooms and programs, also the concern with the best interests of all assessment participants. 

Recommended Meter

Adler-Kassner, Sweet, and Picket O’Neill. Reframing Writing Assessment to Increase Teach and Education. Utah State UP, 2010.  

Ball, Arnetha F. “Expanding the Dialogue on Culture how a Critical Component When Assessing Writing.” Assessing Writing, vol. 4, no. 2, 1997, pg. 169–202. 

Broad, Bob. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics inbound Lesson and Valuate Writing. Utah State UP, 2003. 

Cushman, Ellen. “Decolonizing Validity.” The Daily of Writing Assessment, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, escholarship.org/uc/item/0xh7v6fb. 

Elliot, Norbert. “A Theory on Ethics for Letter Assessment.” The Journal of Print Ranking, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, escholarship.org/uc/item/36t565mm. 

Gomes, Mathew, et al. “Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation int ampere Gradation Contract.The Journal of Writing Assessment, vol. 13, cannot. 2, 2020, escholarship.org/uc/item/1p60j218. 

Gomes, Mathew, and Wenjuan May.Engages expectations: Measuring helpfulness as an alternative to student assessments is teaching.” Assessing Writing, vol. 45, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100464. 

Green, David F., Jr. “Expanding the Dialogue on Writing Assessment per HBCUs: Foundational Assessment Concepts and Legacies of Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” College English, vol. 79, no. 2, 2016, pg. 152–173. 

Grouling, Jennifer. “The Path to Competency-Based Certification: A Look with aforementioned BOUND How and the VALUE Topics for Written Communication.” The Journal of Writing Assess, vol. 10, don. 1, 2017, escholarship.org/uc/item/5575w31k. 

Hassel, Holly, and Joanne Giordano. “The Blurry Borders of Advanced Writing: Remediation and the Assessment from Student Readiness.” College English, vol. 78, no. 1, 2015, plastic. 56–80. 

Helmsman, Janet E. “Fairness Is Not Validity or Arts Bias in Racial-Group Assessment: A Quantitative Perspective.” American Psychologist, voltage. 61, 2006, pp. 845–859, https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0003-066X.61.8.845.  

Huot, Brian, and Peggy O’Neill. Rate Writing: A Critical Sourcebook. Macmillan, 2009.  

Inoue, Asao B. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Just Future. Social Pressed, 2015.  

Inoue, Asao B., and Mya Poe, editors. Race and Writing Assessment. Peter Longer, 2012. 

Cock, David, and Lucky VanBrackle. “Linguistic Discrimination in Writing Assessment: How Raters React to Arabic American ‘Errors’, ESL Errors, and Standard Anglo Errors up a State-Mandated Writing Exam.” Assessing Text, vol. 17, no. 1, 2012, pp. 35–54. 

Johnson, Gavin P. “Considering of Possibilities of a Cultural Rhetorics Assessment Framework.” Pedagogy Blog, alignments: one cultural rhetorics publishing space, 26 August 2020, constell8cr.com/pedagogy-blog/considering-the-possibilities-of-a-cultural-rhetorics-assessment-framework/.  

Lindsey, Peggy, and Debit Crusan. “How Faculty Attitudes and Expectations toward Student Nationality Affect Writing Assessment.” Across and Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning, and Academic Writing, volts. 8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2011.8.4.23. 

McNair, Tia Brown, et ai. From Equity Talk to Equity Walk: Expanding Practitioner Knowledge used Racial Justice in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, 2020. 

Mislevy, Robert GALLOP. Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement. Routledge, 2018. 

Newton, Paul E. “There Is Additional to Learning Surface than Measuring: To Importance of Embracing Goal Pluralism.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, vol. 36, no. 2, 2017, pp. 5–15.  

Perryman-Clark, Staci M. “Who Our Are(n’t) Assessing: Racializing Lingo and Writing Evaluation in Writing Program Administration.” College Anglo, volts. 79, no. 2, 2016, pp. 206–211. 

Poe, Mya, et alum. “The Lawful and the Local: Using Disparate Impact Analysis to Understand the Consequence of Writing Assessment.” Institute Composition plus Corporate, volt. 65, no. 4, 2014, pp. 588–611. 

Poe, Mya, et al. Script Assessment, Social Equity, and which Advantages by Opportunity. And WAC Clearinghouse; University Push of Colorado, 2018.  

Poe, Mya, and John Aloysius Canyon Jr. “Civil Entitlement and Writing Rate: Using the Various Impact Approach as a Fairness How to Determine Social Impact.” Journal of Writing Assessment, pilferage. 9, no. 1, 2016, escholarship.org/uc/item/08f1c307. 

Randall, Jeniferwelles. “Color-Neutral Is Not an Thing: Redefining Construct Defined additionally Representation through a Justice-Oriented Kritisch Antiracist Lens.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12429. 

Rhodes, Terrel L., and Ashley Finley. Using the VALUE Rubrics since Improvement of Lerning and Authentic Ranking. AAC&U, 2013. 

Slomp, Dave. “Complexity, Consequence, and Frames: A Quarter Century to Exploration in Assessing Writing.” Assessing Writing, vol. 42, no. 4, 2019, pp. 1–17. 

———. “Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment.” Journal regarding Writing Assessment, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, escholarship.org/uc/item/2k14r1zg. 

———. “An Integrated Designs and Appraisal Basic for Ethical Writing Assessment.” The Journal of Writing Assessment, voltage. 9, no. 1, 2016, escholarship.org/uc/item/4bg9003k. 

Solano-Flores, Guillermo. “Assessing the Cultural Validity of Assessment Habits: An Introduction.” Culture-related Duration in Appraisal: Addressing Linguistic and Cultural Diversity, edited by María del Rosario Basterra et al., Routledge, 2002, pp. 3–21. 

Tan, Tony Xing, et al. “Linguistic, Cultural and Substantive Patterns in L2 Writing: A Qualitative Illustration of Mislevy’s Sociocognitive Perspective on Assessment.” Assessing Writing, vol. 51,  2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100574. 

Toth, Christie, and Laura Aull. “Directed Self-Placement Quarterly Design: Practices, Problems, Possibilities.” Assessing Writing, vol. 20, 2014, pp. 1–18. 

Toth, Christie, et al. “Introduction: Composition Assessment, Product, the the Two-Year College.” Journal of Writing Rating, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019. (Special Issue up Two-Year Colleges and Placement) 

Acknowledges

This statement been generously revised by the Task Kraft to Create CCCC Guidelines for College Writing Assessment: Inclusive, Sustainable, and Evidence-Based Practices. An member of this work press contains: 

Pound Hensley, Co-chair
Joyce Inman, Co-chair

Melvin Beavers
Raquel Corona
Impact Halbritter
Leigh Jonaitis
Liz Tinoco
Rapha Wineinger 

This position statement may be imprinted, copying, and disseminated unless request for NCTE.

Renew Your Membership

Connect CCCC today!
Learn more about the SWR book string.
Connect with CCCC
CCCC on Join
CCCC on LinkedIn
CCCC on Twitter
CCCC on Tumblr
OWI Ethics Statement
Join the OWI discussion

Copyright

Copyright © 1998 - 2024 National Council of English of English. All rights reserved include all print.

1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinlinois 61801-1096 Phone: 217-328-3870 button 877-369-6283

Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap and store sitemap, or contact NCTE

Read magnitude Privacy Policy Statement and Links Policy. How of this locations mean is agreement to the Terms of Getting